What You Must Know About Libel

What You Must Know About Libel

February 17
19:17 2015

What You Must Know About Libel

What is Libel?

Libel is a
common law tort, governed by state law, in which an individual makes a written “publication”
of a defamatory statement of and concerning the plaintiff that damages the
reputation of the plaintiff.

What are the elements of a cause of
action for libel?

The elements
of a libel suit are:

mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-latin”>1.     A defamatory statement;

mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-latin”>2.     Published to a third party;

mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-latin”>3.     Which the speaker knew or should have
known was false;

mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-latin”>4.     That causes injury to the subject of
the communication


The legal
term for publication; when discussing a libel action, is the purposeful
communication of information to a third party.  The only criterion is that it is communicated
to a third party.


No, for an
action in libel to be upheld, the publisher of a defamatory statement need not
know that a statement is false or defamatory. 
The law concerns the intent of the publisher in communicating a
defamatory statement and is not concerned with the knowledge of the
publisher.  The law states that a
publisher “knew or should have known” that the statement was
false.  Therefore, if an individual
publishes a libelous statement about someone; for example, that they have used
drugs, while under the impression that the statement is representative of a
positive characteristic, the publisher will be liable for libel if that
statement causes harm to the subjects character or reputation.  This is because the publisher should have
known that the communication was defamatory.

However, if
the individual were to publish a statement that would not normally be
considered defamatory; that the individual drives a station wagon for example,
and unbeknownst to the publisher, the individual finds the idea of driving a
station wagon insulting, there is an argument to be made that the publisher
could not have known that his/her statement was defamatory and therefore not
actionable as libel.


Yes, the law
concerning libel requires at least a negligence standard for publication.  The publisher must communicate the
information with the intent to have it read by a third party.  If an individual publishes a defamatory
statement when he/she reasonably believes that no one is going to read it and
the statement is overheard by a third party then it is not defamation. 

The same
applies to communications with the subject of libel.  If an individual makes a defamatory statement
about an individual but the defamed individual is the only one the statement
was communicated to then it is not actionable. 
The law requires publication to a third party.

there defenses to a claim of defamation?

There are 6
recognized defenses to a defamation suit. 
These include:

      – the
truth of a statement is a complete defense to any libel claim.  For example, if an individual publishes a
statement stating that smoking tobacco can lead to emphysema a tobacco company
may not sue on a defamation claim because the statement is true.

      – if a
person makes a publication under the color of an opinion it may be deemed
un-actionable.  The law regarding opinion
is not black and white.  Opinion
statements can be actionable if the public who the statement was published to
would believe that the publisher is a credible source and his statement should
be taken as truth.  For example; if an
individual’s states that he believes that someone is a cheater it is more
likely to be taken as truth if the statement is made by the individual’s
teacher rather than if the statement were made by an enemy of the individual.

      12.0pt;line-height:115%;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial”> – If a speaker/writer
has a duty to communicate to a specific person or on a given occasion.
In some cases the privilege is qualified and may be lost if the publication is
unnecessarily wide or made with malice.

      12.0pt;line-height:115%;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial”>If a publisher has the
authority, from the defamed individual, to make a statement it will be an
absolute bar to a defamation action.  
However, the publisher may not go beyond the scope of consent.

occurs when a party, unknowingly, transfers a defamatory publication.  An example of this would be when a postal
worker delivers a sealed envelope with to a third party that contains
defamatory statements about someone.

Although this is not a complete defense to defamation, the defendant can
mitigate damages by proving that the defamed individual had a bad reputation
for the character trait at issue.  For
example, if defendant published a statement that the plaintiff was a cheater,
the fact that the plaintiff had been caught cheating in the past would go to
the plaintiff’s bad character for that trait and may mitigate damages.

Defamation per se

Libel per se
means “libel on its face.” These are false statements that are
inherently harmful to one’s reputation and character that they do not need to
be proven.  Most states in the Union recognize
some form of libel per se.  The common
examples of libel per se include: statements that injure another’s reputation
in his trade, business or profession; statements claiming someone has a
“loathsome disease”; statements claiming that a person is
“unchaste”; and allegations that an individual has been involved in
criminal activity.

Seditious Libel

libel was a criminal offense in England. 
The law made it a crime, punishable by death to “criticize public
persons, the government, or the King.” The law was adopted in England in
1606 and, even though not enforced in modern times, wasn’t abolished until

The most
famous case involving seditious libel involved the arrest of John Zenger in
1734 after his newspaper publicly criticized the colonial governor of New

The United
States also had its version of seditious libel that was incorporated in the Alien
& Sedition Acts of 1798.  The act,
which was law from 1798 until 1803 made it a criminal offense, subject to
penalties of fines and imprisonment

“to oppose the execution of federal laws; to prevent a federal officer
from performing his or her duties; to aid any insurrection, riot, unlawful
assembly or combination”; or to make any defamatory statement about the
federal government or the president.”

115%”>first, the plaintiff needs to prove that the statement was false.  This can be difficult to prove, especially if
evidence has disappeared.  For some
claims that fall within “libel per se” these are easier to
prove.  The accusation that one is a
criminal can be easily proven false by submitting a lack of a criminal

Second, a
plaintiff needs to prove that the statement was published by the
defendant.  Libel cases are easier to
prove than slander cases.  A perfect
example is when a newspaper makes libelous statements.  There is a printed copy of the statement,
with the authors name usually right under it. 
Slander, however, does not create the same tangible evidence. 

In order to
receive damages the plaintiff must only prove some type of damage.  This damage can be either emotional or
financial.  Juries can award nominal
damages, compensatory damages; and in some cases, often involving
“malice” by a major publisher against a private person, punitive damages.


About Author



Related Articles

Guide To: Defamation Lawyers

Guide to Finding Defense LawyerGuide to Finding Defense Lawyer Defense Lawyers are attorneys, barred by the state, that represent clients who are being sued or being prosecuted for a crime.


Lawyers Dismissed in Pussy Riot CaseLawyers Dismissed in Pussy Riot Case Pursuing a case politically turned out to be a bad move for the attorneys defending two of the young women involved in the Russian “Pussy Riot” court case.
Herman Cain Hires Defamation LawyerHerman Cain Hires Defamation Lawyer Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain has hired a high-profile defamation attorney to review the sexual harassment accusations made public by two women this week.